|
Did you know that your spouse has rights to damages in your court
case? A cause of action called “loss of consortium” can allow your
spouse to “join” your case and become a co-plaintiff to recover money
from the defendant responsible for your injury. If your normal sexual
role in your marriage becomes limited by your injury, that’s loss of
consortium. Strange but true: the government and justice system believe
that a physically loving marriage is important enough to society to
deserve protection and, if harmed, compensation.
When do you
file? Immediately. If your spouse has proof of loss of consortium in a
personal injury suit (usually medical records), raise the issue with
your attorney. He or she will include it in the claim you file with the
court.
In Indiana, a case for the spouse arises when he or
she loses intimate, sexual companionship with an injured spouse, for a
provable period of time, or forever. In some states, it also refers to
the injured spouse’s new inability to care for, show affection for, or
provide normal companionship to the uninjured spouse or their children.
Sometimes, juries don’t like this claim: they figure that it’s
the breaks in life, and that intimacy isn’t replaceable with cash. But
if you have proof, file.
With the Indiana Legislature’s
annually renewed interest in passing a Marriage Amendment to the State
Constitution, loss of consortium may become a political hot potato.
Indiana only allows people who have been civilly or legally married to
sue for this cause; gay couples may not. If gay marriage or civil
unions become legal in Indiana, gay couples will gain the ability to
become co-plaintiffs in personal injury cases. In the meantime, viewed
as a basic civil right (as the State and courts seem to do above), it
is one of many legal weapons in the gay marriage supporters’ arsenal.
English
Common Law, established in 1189 AD, allowed a husband the right to
collect for losing the “services” of his wife. Women had few, if any
rights, in marriage. Indiana took its time, but in 1969, in a case
called Troue v. Marker, the Indiana Supreme Court came around. Now, a
wife may sue for loss of consortium too.
English Common Law
created another version of this, sometimes called “filial consortium.”
In the Middle Ages, many parents relied on their children to work and
earn. The law showed that the child’s income should be replaced to
ensure the family’s survival. Modern courts agree and have added to
this, considering the comfort that a child provides to its parents, and
that the loss of a child’s society is important in a family’s dynamic.
A child’s personal injury doesn’t have to be catastrophic for parents
to be able to sue; an important problem with a child’s capacity to
interact with his or her parents in a normal or usual way is enough.
There
are a few limitations on both kinds of consortium charges: generally,
if you were negligent or contributed to the cause of your own injuries,
your spouse has no loss of consortium suit. This is true in filial
consortium cases as well – a child who contributes to his or her own
accident is held responsible and the parents cannot join the child’s
suit.
Most important of all, no one can collect on a consortium claim after the initial case is decided. Talk to your attorney now!
Please
note: this article is not intended as legal advice. Please consult an Indianapolis Personal Injury Attorney before making any major decisions regarding a law suit.
|